My personal lens preferences: I typically use a focal length of anywhere between 14 to 300mm, depending on what I'm shooting. I'm talking about the focal length for a "full frame" 35mm sensor (for a "crop" sensor or medium format sensor these numbers would not be the same). I hesitate to make too many generalizations, because there are always exceptions, but I'll make some anyway:
Zooms vs prime lenses:
A zoom lens has a focal length range, e.g. 24-105mm, whereas a prime lens is just a single (i.e. fixed) focal length (e.g. 50mm).
Zoom advantages:
First I will speak generically about lenses designed for a "full frame" 35mm sensor - independent of any particular brand.
Single lens: If I can only carry one lens around I'll generally go for f/2.8 24-70 or f/4 24-105 zoom. I might prefer a f/4 14-35 zoom if I'm doing landscape. I might prefer a large-aperture prime (e.g. f/1.8 50mm) if I'm going into a low-light situation, or doing strictly portraits. Obviously I might prefer a macro lens (e.g. f/2.8 100mm) if I'm doing strictly macro work.
If possible, what I really like is to carry around two cameras, each with a different lens. For example a 14-35mm f/4 zoom and a 85mm f/2. I tend to not be interested in having a wide aperture with wide angle lenses (because I want most of the frame in focus) but find I'm more likely to want a wide aperture with a portrait (85mm) lens or other telephoto lens because I'm more interested in a nice background blur with these longer shots. (This is a personal preference of mine - I've never heard anybody else say the same thing.) I might also carry around a third lens in a bag for possible lens change, but I don't like to change lenses a great deal. A great stratgey can be to shoot with a friend and have each person carry different lenses so you can swap and no single person has to carry a lot.
Next, I will focus (no pun intended) on lenses from two popular brands - Canon and Nikon.
- And I will focus just on their newer lens selection for their newer mirrorless full frame cameras.
(They have many older lenses for their D-SLR cameras but I expect these cameras will eventually be phased out.)
Also see: Canon website
focal (mm) | f-stop, etc | weight | filter | price | year | comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zooms: | ||||||
10-20 | 4 L IS STM | 570g (1.3 lb) | rear | $2,300 | 2023 | It would be nice to have this lens but would use 14-35 focal length more often |
15-30 | 4.5-6.3 IS STM | 390g (0.86 lb) | 67mm | $550 | 2022 | A great more aforadable option compared to the 14-35 L lens below |
15-35 | 2.8 L IS USM | 840g (1.85 lb) | 82mm | $2,400 | 2019 | I would prefer the lighter and less expensive 14-35 f/4 below or the still less expensive 15-30 above |
14-35 | 4 L IS USM | 544g (1.2 lb) | 77mm | $1,400 | 2021 | I would expect to like/love this lens |
24-50 | 4.5-6.3 IS STM | 210g (0.46 lb) | 58mm | $300 | 2023 | A great more affordable option compared to the 24-70 f/4 |
24-70 | 2.8 L IS USM | 900g (1.98 lb) | 82mm | $2,400 | 2019 | I would prefer a lighter and less epensive f/4 version |
24-70 | 4 L IS USM | ? | ? | ? | coming eventually | I would expect to like/love this lens |
28-70 | 2.8 IS STM | 495g (1.1 lb) | 67mm | $1,100 | 2024 | I would prefer a f/4 version that is 24-70 instead of 28-70 because I find the 24-28 range very useful |
24-105 | 2.8 L IS USM Z | 1330g (2.93 lb) | 82mm | $3,000 | 2023 | I would prefer the lighter and less expensive f/4 version below |
24-105 | 4 L IS USM | 700g (1.54 lb) | 77mm | $1,300 | 2018 | a great general purpose lens |
24-105 | 4-7.1 IS STM | 395g (0.87 lb) | 67mm | $400 | 2020 | a good general purpose lens, the one above is a better quality lens (but more expensive) |
24-240 | 4-6.3 IS USM | 751g (1.65 lb) | 72mm | $900 | 2019 | generally 10x zooms sacrifice some quality, but some people might love this lens |
28-70 | 2 USM | 1430g (3.15 lb) | 95mm | $3,100 | 2018 | unusually wide aperture for a zoom lens, therefore heavy and expensive |
70-200 | 2.8 L IS USM | 1070g (2.36 lb) | 77mm | $2,800 | 2019 | I would prefer a lighter and less epensive f/4 version, but many professionals will buy this lens |
70-200 | 4 L IS USM | 695g (1.5 lb) | 77mm | $1,600 | 2021 | I would expect to like/love this lens |
100-300 | 2.8 L IS USM | 2590g (5.7 lb) | 112mm | $9,500 | 2023 | very large, heavy, expensive, designed for professionals |
100-400 | 5.6-8 IS USM | 635g (1.4 lb) | 67mm | $650 | 2021 | I would expect to like, but personally would use a 70-200 f/4 lens more often |
100-500 | 4.5-7.1 L IS USM | 1365g (3.0 lb) | 77mm | $2,900 | 2020 | I would expect to like, but heavy and expensive |
200-800 | 6.3-9 IS USM | 2050g (4.52 lb) | 95mm | $1,900 | 2023 | Personally I'd use the 100-400 5.6-8 more often, partly because it's lighter/smaller |
Primes: | ||||||
5.2 | 2.8 L Dual Fisheye | 352g (0.78 lb) | (rear) | $2,000 | 2021 | Specialty lens for VR |
16 | 2.8 STM | 165g (0.36 lb) | 43mm | $300 | 2021 | Nice to have. The more expensive 14-35 f/4 or 15-35 f/2.8 zoom would be alternatives |
24 | 1.8 IS STM | 270g (0.60 lb) | 52mm | $600 | 2022 | Nice to have. I'd probably prefer the 15-30 zoom instead |
35 | 1.8 IS STM Macro | 305g (0.67 lb) | 52mm | $500 | 2018 | I would prefer a 15-35 zoom, or 85 or 100 for macro work, note this is only 1:2 macro (not 1:1) |
35 | 1.4 L VCM | 555g (1.2 lb) | 67mm | $1,500 | 2024 | I would prefer a 15-35 zoom, but this is great if you want the very wide aperture |
50 | 1.2 L USM | 905g (2.09 lb) | 77mm | $2,300 | 2018 | I would prefer a lighter and less expensive f/1.4 or f/1.8 version |
50 | 1.4 L USM | ? | ? | ? | coming eventually | I would expect to like/love this lens |
50 | 1.8 STM | 160g (5.6 oz) | 43mm | $200 | 2020 | I would expect to like this lens but would prefer a slightly better quality f/1.4 L version |
85 | 2 IS STM Macro | 500g (1.1 lb) | 67mm | $600 | 2020 | I would expect to like/love this lens, note this is only 1:2 macro (not 1:1) |
85 | 1.2 L USM | 1195g (2.63 lb) | 82mm | $2,800 | 2019 | I would prefer a lighter and less expensive f.1.4 or f/1.8 version |
85 | 1.2 L USM DS | 1195g (2.63 lb) | 82mm | $3,100 | 2019 | DS stands for Defocus smoothing technology which is a new lens coating |
100 Macro | 2.8 L IS USM | 730g (1.6 lbs) | 67mm | $1,200 | 2021 | I would expect to like/love this lens, 1.4x magnification (larger than 1:1) |
135 | 1.8 L IS USM | 935g (2.1 lbs) | 82mm | $2,100 | 2022 | I would expect to like this lens but would prefer a lighter and less expensive f/2.8 version |
400 | 2.8 IS USM | 2900g (6.4 lb) | 55mm | $12,000 | 2021 | I don't personally desire such a long, heavy, and expensive lens |
600 | 4 IS USM | 3100g (6.8 lb) | 52mm | $13,000 | 2021 | I don't personally desire such a long, heavy, and expensive lens |
600 | 11 IS STM | 930g (2.05 lb) | 82mm | $800 | 2020 | I don't personally desire such a long lens |
Canon does make a few lenses over 600mm in focal length but I'm not going to bother to list them. |